Yahoo says this guy might have a case.
In its just-published annual report, Yahoo changed its tune about the giant lawsuit in Mexico it's in the process of appealing.Yahoo shocked investors in November when it revealed that a court had awarded a company run by Mexican entrepreneur Carlos Bazan-Canabal $2.7 billion in damages in a contractual dispute, a judgment Yahoo's in the process of appealing.
In its fourth-quarter earnings call, Yahoo CFO Ken Goldman told analysts that it wasn't setting aside money in case it lost?because it expected to win on appeal.
The language in Yahoo's annual report is more nuanced, warning shareholders that it may have to put money aside in the future if it changes its mind about the prospects of winning.
Here's the relevant paragraph:
On November 28, 2012, the 49th Civil Court of the Federal District of Mexico City entered a non-final judgment of U.S. $2.75 billion against the Company and our subsidiary, Yahoo! Mexico, in a lawsuit brought by plaintiffs Worldwide Directories S.A. de C.V. and Ideas Interactivas, S.A. de C.V. We believe the plaintiffs? claims are without legal or factual merit and the Company and Yahoo! Mexico have filed appeals from the judgment. We do not believe that it is probable the judgment will be sustained on appeal, and accordingly, we have not recorded an accrual for the judgment. The Company cannot predict the timing of a decision or assure the ultimate outcome of the appeals. The Company intends to vigorously pursue all of its appeals. If all of our appeals are ultimately unsuccessful, however, and we are required to pay all or a significant portion of the judgment, together with any potential additional damages, interests and costs, it would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We will also be required to record an accrual for the judgment if we should determine in the future that it is probable that we will be required to pay the judgment.
Yahoo also gave a far more detailed account of the lawsuit. The most interesting thing: Yahoo says that the $2.7 billion judgment was issued by a law clerk, on behalf of a judge who had stepped down from his position before the judgement was entered.
Mexico Matter. On November 16, 2011, plaintiffs Worldwide Directories, S.A. de C.V. (?WWD?), and Ideas Interactivas, S.A. de C.V. (?Ideas?) filed an action in the 49th Civil Court of Mexico against the Company, Yahoo! de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (?Yahoo! Mexico?), Yahoo International Subsidiary Holdings, Inc., and Yahoo Hispanic Americas LLC. The complaint alleged claims of breach of contract, breach of promise, and lost profits in connection with various commercial contracts entered into among the parties between 2002 and 2004, relating to a business listings service, and alleged total damages of approximately $2.75 billion. On December 7, 2011, Yahoo! Mexico filed a counterclaim against WWD for payments of approximately $2.6 million owed to Yahoo! Mexico for services rendered. On April 10, 2012, plaintiffs withdrew their claim filed against Yahoo International Subsidiary Holdings, Inc. and Yahoo Hispanic Americas LLC.
On November 28, 2012, the 49th Civil Court of Mexico entered a non-final judgment against the Company and Yahoo! Mexico in the amount of USD $2.75 billion and a non-final judgment in favor of Yahoo! Mexico on its counterclaim against WWD in the amount of $2.6 million. The judgment against the Company and Yahoo! Mexico purports to leave open for determination in future proceedings certain other alleged damages that were not quantified in the judgment. The judgment was issued by a law clerk to the trial court judge who presided over the entire case during the trial court proceedings but stepped down from his position shortly before the judgment was entered.
On December 12, 2012 and December 13, 2012, respectively, Yahoo! Mexico and the Company appealed the judgment to a three-magistrate panel of the Superior Court of Justice for the Federal District (the ?Superior Court?). The appeals must be heard as a matter of law and are pending.
The Company believes the plaintiffs? claims are without legal or factual merit. First, the plaintiffs? claims are based on agreements that were either terminated by agreement with releases or had expired or terminated in accordance with their terms, a non-binding letter of intent pursuant to which no definitive agreements were ever entered into by the parties, and correspondence that did not constitute agreements. Second, the loss of profits of the type claimed by plaintiffs are not awardable under Mexico law because they were not a direct and immediate consequence of a breach of contract. Of the $2.75 billion in total damages alleged by plaintiffs, more than $2.4 billion were for loss of profits. Third, the plaintiffs? alleged damages and loss of profits were further precluded by the agreements at issue through, among other things, contractual and legal limitations of liability. Fourth, the plaintiffs? pleadings in the complaint, as well as documentary evidence filed by the plaintiffs in support of their allegations, were generally deficient to support or establish plaintiffs? claims. Fifth, the decision failed to consider substantially all of the defenses asserted by the Company and Yahoo! Mexico. Finally, the Company believes that the law clerk who entered the judgment lacked the requisite authority to issue the judgment.
The Company does not believe that it is probable that the judgment will be sustained on appeal and, accordingly, has not recorded an accrual for the judgment.
The Company cannot predict the timing of a decision or assure the ultimate outcome of its appeals. The Company intends to vigorously pursue all of its appeals. If the current appeals were to be unsuccessful, the Company and Yahoo! Mexico may file a petition with the Mexican Federal Civil Collegiate Court for the First Circuit (the ?Civil Collegiate Court?) to challenge the decision of the Superior Court as unconstitutional, unlawful, or both. If filed, this petition also must be heard as a matter of law. The parties may then petition for review of any decision of the Civil Collegiate Court to the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation of Mexico (the ?Mexico Supreme Court?). A petition to the Mexico Supreme Court, if filed, is granted at the discretion of the Mexico Supreme Court and its review is limited to interpretations of the Constitution of Mexico or the constitutionality of a provision of Mexico law.
The Company has determined, based on current knowledge, that the amount or range of reasonably possible losses, including reasonably possible losses in excess of amounts already accrued, is not reasonably estimable with respect to certain matters described above. The Company has also determined, based on current knowledge, that the aggregate amount or range of losses that are estimable with respect to the Company?s legal proceedings, including the matters described above other than the Mexico matter, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company?s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Amounts accrued as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012 were not material. The ultimate outcome of legal proceedings involves judgments, estimates and inherent uncertainties, and cannot be predicted with certainty. In the event of a determination adverse to Yahoo!, its subsidiaries, directors, or officers in these matters including in the Mexico matter, however, the Company may incur substantial monetary liability and/or be required to change its business practices. Either of these events could have a material adverse effect on the Company?s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company may also incur substantial legal fees, which are expensed as incurred, in defending against these.
Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/yahoo-hedges-mexico-lawsuit-disclosure-2013-3
Jerry Nelson Foo Canoodle Isaac path Tropical Storm Isaac path Hurricane Katrina Hurricane Isaac Path
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন